This winding patron is just wrong. With strong cores the problem is clear audible. I will show a better patron tomorrow 🙂

🙂 🙂

''This winding patron is just wrong. With strong cores the problem is clear audible. I will show a better patron tomorrow''

* Look forward to that, thanks for sharing Wijnand!!

If you do not mind, a few questions came up. No rush.

* Why did Eric choose a specific pattern for his favorite choke cable instead of your choice? Also keep in mind that Eric's audio equipment isn't as resolving as yours, far from it I would say. (actually this is more a question for Tobias, do you know about the chosen pattern maybe? materials? he mentions nanocrystals. Or did he improve on it since?)

* Did you make any changes to the latest version of the core box? Are your friends already using it?

* I've been thinking about isolation, specifically UTP vs. STP/SFTP. You've chosen SFTP on both ends of the core box, connecting all devices through the cable shielding and with a copper ground cable. server + switch + (choke cable?) +  router. Can you explain why you chose this and if you've tried (partially) UTP or without ground cable connected?

* Regarding the cable shield at the server, typically it's disconnected for better results, but you've done the opposite. Can you explain why, considering system dependence?

This balanced winding patron prevents energy fields in the core. An energy field will create noise on the stream. On low quality cores its less important.

The ultimate network. This clock brings extreme quality to music. In my network are 3 core boxes and one ultra switch. The coreboxes brought a major impact on the sound, but still the clock dubbels the impact. I have to wait at least 24 hours before I can say if the clock can stay in the network, because in the past it always dubbeled the network trouble as well. But when life music is played with this clock switch even the public applauding will bring goosebumps