Friday, June 5, 2026
Home Review Atoll DAC200 Signature – insight and careful listening

Review Atoll DAC200 Signature – insight and careful listening

8

Pros

  • Insightfull sound
  • Good recordings really 'sing'
  • Enough connectivity

Cons

  • Bit up front
  • Fickle with lesser recordings
  • Match with the audio system is critical

Price: € 1800

Build quality
Usability
Sound
Price

Measurements and conclusion

We measured the Atoll DAC200 on the Prism dScope, Aeroflex and Wavecrest. The DAC200 actually measures not that great. Noise is okay, but dynamic range is not great. Jitter is also on the high side. The Jtest (that we don’t like) shows this already with ridiculous numbers, but the Aeroflex and Wavecrest confirm that jitter is high. We measure around 80 – 100ps.

Bluetooth tests

We were curious what impact the bluetooth module has. Disconnecting it actually has some influence on jitter… so disable BT if you can.

General measurements

Conclusion

Just as 'Slow cooking' encourages you to take time and pay attention to preparing and eating food, this Atoll DAC200 Signature is 'slow music listening'. You really have to sit down for it, listen consciously and then you get a music experience that unwind and let you come to new insights into music you've been listening to for a long time.

The DAC200 is critical of the material on offer though, in that respect it is a DAC for connoisseurs.

Type test
Single Test
Inputs
  • Digital Coaxial
  • Digital Optical
  • Digital AES
  • Digital USB
  • Bluetooth
Outputs
  • Analog RCA
  • Analog XLR
  • Digital Coaxial
  • Digital Optical
Product type
D/A-converter
Max samplingrate
768 kHz
Max bit depth
32 bit
Weight
5 Kg
Dimensions
  • Width: 44 cm
  • Depth: 29,3 cm
  • Height: 6,3 cm
Production country
France

Winkels met Atoll

Cort van der Lindelaan 11
9722 LP Groningen, NL
Schoenmakersstraat 19
6041EX Roermond, NL
Stationsweg 87
9471 GM Zuidlaren, NL
St. Ceciliastraat 28
5038 HA Tilburg, NL
Spoorstraat 18
7491 CK Delden, Overijssel, NL
Steenstraat 54
6828 CM Arnhem, Gelderland, NL
St.-Katelijnevest 53
2000 Antwerpen, BE
Beethovenstraat 9-b
1077 HL Amsterdam, Noord Holland, NL
Rietlaan 4
3851 PA Ermelo, NL
Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Oleg Solodukha
1 year ago

Hi Martijn,

Thanks for the comprehensive answer! After reading your review of the ST200 and your favorable assessment of the ST200’s integrated DAC, I actually compared it with the standalone DAC200. And for me the latter is noticeably better…

I will disconnect the Bluetooth module in the DAC200 as you recommended. But is it possible that the Bluetooth module is defective in some units and OK in others?

The ST200 also has a Bluetooth module as I recall. Does this negatively affect the sound of the streamer?

Appreciate your advice!

Regards,
Oleg

Oleg Solodukha
Reply to  Martijn (redacteur)
1 year ago

Thank you for your advice and your reviews!

Oleg Solodukha
1 year ago

Hello Martijn,

Thank you for the review!

I have this very DAC and, in fact, all my components (DR200, ST200 Sign, in400SE and DAC200) were made by ATOLL.
You mentioned the questionable measurements of this model. And you are not alone in this. I found another reviewer who came to similar (or worse!) conclusions:

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/atoll-dac200-signature-review-measurements-dac.44288/

Do you think it’s acceptable for this kind of product to measure so badly? And what could that mean? Does ATOLL tune its products by ear only? How much does it affect the sound? What to do with the jitter?!

Best,
Oleg

Brian Viger
1 year ago

Hello Martijn, thank you for the feedback.

I would have never considered touching the filter setting without you having mentioned it in your review.

I set my DAC300 to “slow min”.

All the best to you, and the Alpha Audio team.

Regards,
Brian

Brian Viger
1 year ago

Hello Martijn, excellent review on the Atoll DAC.

I still have my DAC200 Signature, but I ultimately upgraded to the DAC300.

I’ve always used the default filter without any issue.

Your article doesn’t mention it, but can you please share your insights on the filters and what was your choice in the end, what filter worked best for you?

Brian

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
×