Home Review Eversolo T8 streaming transport – “Blinded By The Light”

Review Eversolo T8 streaming transport – “Blinded By The Light”

14

Pros

  • High quality digital signal out
  • Can host almost every streaming or radio service available
  • Storage expandable up to 16Tb for digtital music files

Cons

  • Inconsistencies between Eversolo app and touch screen operations
  • Clean, calm, but somewhat demure sound
  • Essential options hidden in the software at illogical places

Price: € 1380

Build quality
Usability
Sound
Price

Intro

The Eversolo T8 is a streaming transport. Its software capabilities are extensive. Does this have impact on the ease of operation? And what is the influence on the sound quality that reaches your ears? We highlight both aspects in detail.

There is a lot to explore on this player, which is what the first part of this review is about. The second part of the review is the most interesting for those who are more interested in sound quality. I you do not have patience, the conclusion is a short summary.

The hardware of the Eversolo T8

The large, brightly lit touch screen that covers the entire front is unavoidable. The screen can be dimmed or turned off. The screen responds to touch without delay.

At the backside, we find every conceivable digital connection, with the exception of BNC. It all looks well cared for and the labels are clear.

A network can be connected through WiFi, a normal network plug or a fibre optic module.

Eversolo’s website is filled with pictures of transformers and texts like “Ultra-High Precision Femtosecond Clock”. We will hear how this plays out in practice when listening.

Some points of interest for new users

Streamers are computers with software. Eversolo uses the Android operating system and has built its own interface around it. As anyone who uses computers knows: software does not always work logically.

There are two, rather tedious, points you need to know before getting started with the Eversolo:

  1. The ‘paper’ (PDF) manual is incomplete. Ignore it as it will only confuse you. All relevant information can be found on the touch screen.
  2. There are inconsistencies in operating the device between the touch screen and the Eversolo app. Options are missing in the app. Where relevant, I mention it in the review.

In the (iPad) app, a ‘screen’ option in the menu mirrors the touch screen. You can control the same interface items with your fingers in the screen mirror of the app as you will on the physical screen. This is a smart feature, but unfortunately also a necessary one.

EQ and automatic room correction

Being able to apply corrections to the sound curve or use automated correction based on measurements of the acoustics of the listening room is an important purchase argument for many audio enthusiasts.

This reviewer has had good experiences with automated corrections for active speakers, but Eversolo’s software does not work adequately with the iPhone’s microphone. A good (USB) measuring microphone is probably indispensable.

We at Alpha Audio do not have much affinity with (manual) EQ functions on consumer hi-fi equipment. If you are serious about EQ, as a publication, you also need to posses the knowledge to write about it.

Enough, on to the review!

Fortunately, there is a lot to say about where our focus does lie, so we get going! Enjoy reading this rather comprehensive review.

Type test
Single Test
Inputs
  • Streamer ethernet
  • Streamer wifi
  • Bluetooth
Outputs
  • Digital Coaxial
  • Digital Optical
  • Digital AES
  • Digital USB
Product type
Streamer
Max samplingrate
768 kHz
Max bit depth
32 bit
Weight
4.5 Kg
Dimensions
  • Width: 31.5 cm
  • Depth: 23 cm
  • Height: 8.8 cm
Production country
China

Winkels met Eversolo

Grotestraat 23
5931 CS Tegelen, NL
Breestraat 146-148
2311CX Leiden, Zuid Holland, NL
Strandlaan 281
8670 Koksijde, BE
Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Peter Arbeek
5 months ago

Dank voor deze fijne review. Helder en to the point. Ik heme altijd algevraagd wat de geluidsmatige invloed is van een transport op de rest van de keten.
Zelf heb ik momenteel een Aurender a100 met een Leema Tucana II en de Raidho X1 (met dank aan Jaap voor de destijds mini review van de speakers)
Bekabeling is Shunyata en Crystal Cable. Na het beluisteren van de Denafrips Pontus 15 zit ik er sterk aan te denken on deze in mijn setup te plaatsen en de a100 enkel als transport the beluisteren. Dan rijst dus de vraag in hoeverre de a100 invloed heeft op het totale geluidsbeeld. Het mooie van de Eversolo en de a100 is dat ze een interne opslag hebben en zodanig als server dienen wat sterk mijn voorkeur heeft plus een gedegen interface voor zoeken en afspelen. Jammer dat Auralic gestopt is wat dat betreft. Bedieningsgemak is ook deel van de belevenis . Waarin zit ‘m het klankmatige verschil tussen a100 als transport en de Eversolo? Apple Music is trouwens wel een plus maar geen dealbreker.

Peter Arbeek
Reply to  Martijn (redacteur)
5 months ago

Bedoel je geen Pontus of geen Eversolo?

Peter Arbeek
Reply to  Martijn (redacteur)
5 months ago

De Aurender is een geweldige streamer/Dac. Het leek me zonde om deze enkel nog te gebruiken als transport.

Peter Arbeek
Reply to  Martijn (redacteur)
5 months ago

Ik snap de verwarring, mijn excuses
De Eversolo leek mij een alternatief voor de Aurender, mede vanwege de optisch aansluiting en I2S.
Aan de ander kant is de opbouw van Aurender rock solid en kan nog een tijd mee. Ben er dus nog niet helemaal uit, Aurender, of een dedicated transport. Eerst de Pontus / Aurender combo en go from there…

Roberto Brandoli
5 months ago

I find this comparison very partially. In my opinion, there are significant differences in transports and DDCs depending on the interface used. The T8 has an I2S interface that I consider superior to the others (USB and AES), so a DAC capable of making these comparisons was needed, which are crucial to the final result and therefore also in choosing the best audio device. I’m sorry because I consider your site one of the most serious and professional. 
Could you consider doing a second part when you will have a DAC with an I2S input?

Jaap Veenstra
Reply to  Roberto Brandoli
5 months ago

An I2S-connection is not magic. Originally, the I2S-connection was made voor inter-ic-onnectivity. Not for external connection with long cables. The difference is that clock and data are seperated. And that the dac becomes leading (and that actually says that the source is not that great). The shift in ‘master’ and the fact that clock and data are seperated can result in more calmness and for example more control. And maybe better focus. So, of course we recommend you try it. But it doesn’t change the complete characteristic of the dac.

Last edited 5 months ago by Jaap Veenstra
medon78
5 months ago

I really wish Qobuz would fix the “connect sounds worse compared to native streaming” issue. It’s clearly not hardware (read: streamer) related.

Last edited 5 months ago by medon78
Jerome Visser
5 months ago

Met verwondering deze review gelezen. Ik denk dat het een gemiste kans is dat de FSP aansluiting niet is gebruikt. En ook heel raar dat er met geen woord over wordt gerept…… Je mag toch verwachten dat een innovatieve functie op een streamer wordt bekeken en uitgeprobeerd. Jammer. Ik denk dat de T8 en de lezers daarmee te kort zijn gedaan.

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
×